Submission guidelines

Submission guidelines

To submit a proposal to this series please get in touch with the series editor via email:

Dr Ron Iphofen
[email protected]

 

See our guidance on how to write a proposal

 

Editorial team

Editorial team

About the Editor

Series Editor

Dr. Ron Iphofen, FAcSS, is an internationally recognised expert in research ethics and scientific integrity.

He retired as Director of Postgraduate Studies in the School of Healthcare Sciences at Bangor University, Wales, in 2008. Since then, he has served as an adviser to the European Commission and the European Research Council on major research programs, including FP7 and Horizon 2020.

Editorial Board

  • Professor Robert Dingwall, FAcSS, Dingwayy Enterprises Ltd and Nottingham Trent University, UK
  • Dr Nathan Emmerich, Institute of Ethics, Dublin City University and Queens University Belfast, UK
  • Mark Israel, Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services, Australia
  • Professor John Oates, FAcSS, Open University, UK
  • Associate Professor Martin Tolich, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Dr Helen Busby, Independent Research Ethics Advisor, UK
  • Professor Julian Kinderlerer, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Dr Emily Postan, University of Edinburgh, UK

 

Calls for submissions

Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity addresses new problems, issues and concerns in the fields of research ethics and research integrity.

ISSN: 2398-6018

Aims and scope

Research ethics and integrity problems continue to challenge the research community. New cases constantly test the resources of professional associations and research ethics review committees alike. This series is unique in confronting these challenges head-on by debating and suggesting realistic solutions that can be implemented in practice.

This series offers practical help and guidance in actual research engagements as well as meeting the often varied and challenging demands of research ethics review. Thus the approach is not one of abstract moral philosophy; instead it seeks to help researchers think through the potential harms and benefits of their work and its societal impact and acceptance.

While the research community can be highly imaginative both in the fields of study and methodological innovation the structures of management and reward can pressure researchers into errors of judgment that can have personal and professional consequences.

This series adopts a virtue ethics approach which promotes good practice and sets principles, values and standards that can act as models to aid successful research outcomes. There is clear international appeal as researchers, commissioners and practitioners alike share a vested interest in the global promotion of professional values and standards that lead to public acceptability.

Background to the series

The series editor has made a complete chapter describing the origins of this series available to read free of charge. Please read and share and help us to start a conversation about creating ethics review processes that really work.

Read the chapter

This title is aligned with our fairer society goal

We are passionate about working with researchers globally to deliver a fairer, more inclusive society. This perhaps has never been more important than in today’s divided world.

SDG 1 No poverty
SDG 2 Zero hunger
SDG 5 Gender equality
SDG 8 Decent work & economic growth
SDG 10 Reduced inequalities
SDG 16 Peace, justice & strong institutions
Find out about our fairer society goal