Digital Innovation and Business Process Management: Advancing theory and practice

Closes:

Submit your paper here!

Introduction

Recent studies by McKinsey & Co. (2022; 2024) highlight that companies worldwide spend an estimated $230 billion on managing business processes. Ranging from customer-care functions, such as call centres, to back-office processing in applications such as claims, transactions and payments, finance, and procurement. Moreover, the Information Technology-Business Process Management (IT-BPM) sector in 2022 has found a 15.5 percent growth in revenue, against a 2.1 percent growth a year back.This steep increase has been fuelled by the fast-paced digital transformation across industries during the Pandemic years and by the adoption of enterprise-scale data and cloud strategy, among other factors (Dabic, et al., 2023; Bargoni et al., 2024b; Bertello et al., 2021; Bresciani et al., 2021; Del Giudice et al., 2021; Scuotto et al., 2023). These numbers well depict the importance of technology and digital innovation in improving the efficiency and quality of the firm processes through effective BPM (Mendling et al., 2020). In fact, due to the development of information technology (IT) infrastructures and digital innovation, organizations are continuously redefining their business, clearly showing that digital innovation is acting as a catalyst for business process reengineering (BPR) and business process innovation (BPI; Anand et al., 2013; Beerepoot et al., 2023; Dezi et al., 2018; Rialti et al., 2018).  

While the academic literature on BPM appears to be fragmented and lacking a widely accepted categorization of its different streams (Klun & Trkman, 2018), the role of digital innovation appears to be fundamental in the re-conceptualization of the field in becoming a cornerstone in this area (Majchrzak et al., 2016; Melville et al., 2004; Trainor et al., 2014; Trkman & Klun, 2015). BPM is tightly linked to information technology (IT) development and the digitalization process of firms (Legner et al., 2017; Caputo et.al., 2021). For example, the integration of Industry 4.0 features into BPM (Czvetkó et al., 2022) has allowed developing of real-time capability, interoperability, modularity, decentralization, and virtualization as well as integration (vertical and horizontal) of processes through ICT (Information and Communications Technology) systems (Pérez-Lara et al., 2020; Safar et al., 2018). 

This has enabled the development of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs; Monostori et al., 2016; Ryalat et al., 2023; Somers et al., 2023), collaborating computational entities connected to the surrounding physical world and its processes. CPSs provide and use, at the same time, data-accessing and data-processing services available on the Internet, ultimately improving the efficiency of manufacturing (Fortoul-Diaz et al., 2023; Neal et al., 2021). The steep increase in data-driven workflow management (vertical and horizontal) facilitates collaboration between multiple devices (i.e., machine to machine), business management systems and production lines, and data sharing between business units (Zhang et al., 2021). Adapting these changes requires a new perspective and leads to the need to rethink and redesign BPM and its models (Gabryelczyk et al., 2022; Gerlitz, 2016; Gross et al., 2021; Tsakalidis & Vergidis, 2024).  

In the same direction, blockchain has drastically changed how inter-organizational processes operate (Abunadi & Kumar, 2021; Weber et al., 2016). As defined by Mendling et al. (2018, p 3) “blockchain is a distributed database technology that builds on a tamper-proof list of timestamped transaction records” that allows executing processes in a trustworthy manner even in a network without any mutual trust between nodes.  

Integrating digital technologies into BPM practices appears essential for organizations to remain competitive in today's digital economy (Ivanišević et al., 2023). For example, digital technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), Robotic Process Automation (RPA), and blockchain can automate repetitive and time-consuming tasks, improve decision-making processes, and enhance customer experiences (Birkbeck & Rowe, 2023; Haleem et al., 2021; Himeur et al., 2023). However, while the integration of digital technologies seems to provide unprecedented advantages for firms, it also poses several challenges, including data security, privacy concerns, and managing complexity (Abunadi & Kumar, 2021; Daim & Dabić, 2023; Ferraris et al., 2017, 2019). In fact, the adoption of new technologies often requires a contiguous transformation of the business processes to trigger organizational efficiency or business performance (Idogawa et al., 2023; Khan et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024; Schneider et al., 2024). Even so, extant research has found that the majority of BPM methods do not support innovation and thus fail to capitalize on the opportunities associated with digital innovation (Scuotto et al., 2016; Grisold et al., 2021; Gross et al., 2019; Kerpedzhiev et al., 2021; Mendling et al., 2020; Van Looy, 2021; vom Brocke et al., 2020). This observation has been affirmed by recent calls for redeveloping BPM to become more explorative and opportunity-driven (Grisold et al., 2019). Nonetheless, the question of how organizations do or can embrace digital innovation within their business process work remains largely unexplored (Bargoni et al., 2024; Del Giudice et al., 2021; Gross et al., 2021; Mikalef & Krogstie, 2020). 

In fact, the integration of these technologies into BPM practices requires careful planning and execution. Organizations must ensure that their BPM systems are compatible with digital technologies and develop governance and control mechanisms to manage the complexity of digital BPM. Moreover, organizations must address the potential risks associated with the use of digital technologies, such as data security and privacy concerns. Despite these challenges, the integration of digital technologies into BPM practices offers significant opportunities for organizations to improve their operational efficiency, innovation, and competitiveness. 

In this light, this special issue aims to increase awareness about how organizations can integrate digital innovation within their business processes. Its underlying objective is to disseminate knowledge and understand how digital innovation (from a BPM perspective) may play a pivotal role in sailing through complex and challenging moments for firms. The guest editors encourage submissions of contributions that address the challenges and opportunities of digitalization for BPM and/or case studies and best practices that demonstrate successful digital BPM initiatives. Theoretical as well as empirical studies (qualitative and/or quantitative) are welcome, and these could focus either on SMEs, large organizations, start-ups, public organizations, or not-for-profit. Finally, contributions are expected to clarify their scholarly, as well as managerial, implications. 

List of Topic Areas

The Business Process Management Journal invites submissions on the theme of digitalization and its impact on BPM. We welcome papers that explore the following topics: 

  • Digital transformation and BPM: integration of technologies (e.g., blockchain, artificial intelligence, edge computing, robotic process automation) into information systems and BPM to enhance efficiency, security, and decision-making processes (e.g., Robotic Process Automation, AI-augmented Business Process Management Systems). 
  • Human-Centric BPM: exploring the impact of BPM on the human aspects, focusing on user experience, user interface design, and the psychology of stakeholders involved in business processes management. 
  • Knowledge Management and Learning Systems: exploring how information systems and BPM can contribute to effective knowledge management and continuous learning within organizations. 
  • Post-Implementation Challenges: analyzing challenges that organizations face after implementing information systems and BPM solutions, focusing on issues such as system scalability, maintenance, and long-term sustainability. 
  • Governance and control of digital BPM: focusing on the challenges involved in the strategic oversight, management practices, and control mechanisms designed to ensure that digital BPM initiatives align with organizational goals, comply with regulatory requirements, and achieve efficiency and effectiveness in business processes.  
  • Digitalization and the Future of Work 

Submissions Information

Submissions are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts. Registration and access are available here.
Author guidelines must be strictly followed. Please see here.
Authors should select (from the drop-down menu) the special issue title at the appropriate step in the submission process, i.e. in response to ““Please select the issue you are submitting to”. 
Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal.

Key Deadlines

Closing date for manuscripts submission: July 31, 2024 

Guest Editors

Prof. Stefano Bresciani ([email protected]), University of Turin; 
Prof. Augusto Bargoni ([email protected]),  University of Turin; 
Prof. Marina Dabić ([email protected]), Faculty of  Economics and Business University of Zagreb

References

Abunadi, I., & Kumar, R. L. (2021). Blockchain and business process management in health care, especially for COVID-19 cases. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2245808 
Anand, A., Fosso Wamba, S., & Gnanzou, D. (2013). A literature review on business process management, business process reengineering, and business process innovation. Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation: 9th International Workshop, EOMAS 2013, Held at CAiSE 2013, Valencia, Spain, June 17, 2013, Selected Papers 9, 1–23. 
Bargoni, A., Smrčka, L., Santoro, G., & Ferraris, A. (2024). Highway to hell or paradise city? Exploring the role of growth hacking in learning from innovation failure. Technovation, 131, 102945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102945 
Bargoni, A., Ferraris, A., Vilamová, Š., & Wan Hussain, W. M. H. (2024b). Digitalisation and internationalisation in SMEs: a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2022-0473 
Beerepoot, I., Di Ciccio, C., Reijers, H. A., Rinderle-Ma, S., Bandara, W., Burattin, A., Calvanese, D., Chen, T., Cohen, I., Depaire, B., Di Federico, G., Dumas, M., van Dun, C., Fehrer, T., Fischer, D. A., Gal, A., Indulska, M., Isahagian, V., Klinkmüller, C., … Zerbato, F. (2023). The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die. Computers in Industry, 146, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103837 
Bertello, A., Ferraris, A., Bresciani, S., & De Bernardi, P. (2021). Big data analytics (BDA) and degree of internationalization: The interplay between governance of BDA infrastructure and BDA capabilities. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(4), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09542-w 
Birkbeck, A., & Rowe, L. (2023). Navigating towards hyperautomation and the empowerment of human capital in family businesses: A perspective article. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2023-0157 
Bresciani, S., Ciampi, F., Meli, F., & Ferraris, A. (2021). Using big data for co-innovation processes: Mapping the field of data-driven innovation, proposing theoretical developments and providing a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102347 
Czvetkó, T., Kummer, A., Ruppert, T., & Abonyi, J. (2022). Data-driven business process management-based development of Industry 4.0 solutions. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 36, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.12.002 
Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M. M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of business research, 123, 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3319406. 
Dabić, M., Daim, T., Bogers, M. L., & Mention, A. L. (2023). The limits of open innovation: Failures, risks, and costs in open innovation practice and theory. Technovation, 126, 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102786. 
Daim, T. U., & Dabić, M. (2023). Cybersecurity: A Technology Landscape Analysis. Springer Nature. 
Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., Mazzucchelli, A., & Fiano, F. (2021). Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: The moderating effect of big data. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2020-0119 
Dezi, L., Santoro, G., Gabteni, H., & Pellicelli, A. C. (2018). The role of big data in shaping ambidextrous business process management: Case studies from the service industry. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1163-1175. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2017-0215 
Ferraris, A., Mazzoleni, A., Devalle, A., & Couturier, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and knowledge management: Impact on firm performance. Management Decision, 57(8),1923-1936. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0825 
Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Bresciani, S. (2017). Open innovation in multinational companies’ subsidiaries: The role of internal and external knowledge. European Journal of International Management, 11(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2017.085583 
Fortoul-Diaz, J. A., Carrillo-Martinez, L. A., Centeno-Tellez, A., Cortes-Santacruz, F., Olmos-Pineda, I., & Flores-Quintero, R. R. (2023). A Smart Factory Architecture Based on Industry 4.0 Technologies: Open-Source Software Implementation. IEEE Access, 11, 101727–101749. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3316116 
Gabryelczyk, R., Sipior, J. C., & Biernikowicz, A. (2022). Motivations to Adopt BPM in View of Digital Transformation. Information Systems Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2163324 
Gerlitz, L. (2016). Design management as a domain of smart and sustainable enterprise: Business modelling for innovation and smart growth in Industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(3), 244. 
Grisold, T., Gross, S., Röglinger, M., Stelzl, K., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Exploring explorative BPM-setting the ground for future research. Business Process Management: 17th International Conference, BPM 2019, Vienna, Austria, September 1–6, 2019, Proceedings 17, 23–31. 
Grisold, T., vom Brocke, J., University of Liechtenstein, Gross, S., Mendling, J., Röglinger, M., & Stelzl, K. (2021). Digital Innovation and Business Process Management: Opportunities and Challenges as Perceived by Practitioners. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 49(1), 556–571. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04927 
Gross, S., Mandelburger, M. M., & Mendling, J. (2019). Navigating through the maze of business process change methods. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-52), 6270–6279. 
Gross, S., Stelzl, K., Grisold, T., Mendling, J., Röglinger, M., & vom Brocke, J. (2021). The Business Process Design Space for exploring process redesign alternatives. Business Process Management Journal, 27(8), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2020-0116 
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., Rab, S., & Suman, R. (2021). Hyperautomation for the enhancement of automation in industries. Sensors International, 2, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100124 
Himeur, Y., Elnour, M., Fadli, F., Meskin, N., Petri, I., Rezgui, Y., Bensaali, F., & Amira, A. (2023). AI-big data analytics for building automation and management systems: A survey, actual challenges and future perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(6), 4929–5021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10286-2 
Idogawa, J., Bizarrias, F. S., & Câmara, R. (2023). Critical success factors for change management in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 29(7), 2009–2033. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2022-0625 
Ivanišević, R., Horvat, D., & Matić, M. (2023). Business process redesign as a basic aspect of digital business transformation. Strategic Management, 00, 40–40. https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2300040I 
Kerpedzhiev, G. D., König, U. M., Röglinger, M., & Rosemann, M. (2021). An exploration into future business process management capabilities in view of digitalization: Results from a Delphi study. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00637-0 
Khan, A. N., Jabeen, F., Mehmood, K., Ali Soomro, M., & Bresciani, S. (2023). Paving the way for technological innovation through adoption of artificial intelligence in conservative industries. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114019 
Klun, M., & Trkman, P. (2018). Business process management – at the crossroads. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), 786–813. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2016-0226 
Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Mädche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2 
Liu, Y., Guo, M., Han, Z., Gavurova, B., Bresciani, S., & Wang, T. (2024). Effects of digital orientation on organizational resilience: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(2), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2023-0224 
Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–278. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26628906 
McKinsey & Co. (2022). The promise from digitizing business-process management | McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/getting-b…;
McKinsey&Co. (2024). Business operations in 2024: Navigating the new normal. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/navigatin…;
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 283–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636 
Mendling, J., Pentland, B. T., & Recker, J. (2020). Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation. In European journal of information systems (Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 208–219). Taylor & Francis. 
Mendling, J., Weber, I., Aalst, W. V. D., Brocke, J. V., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., Debois, S., Ciccio, C. D., Dumas, M., Dustdar, S., Gal, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Governatori, G., Hull, R., Rosa, M. L., Leopold, H., Leymann, F., Recker, J., Reichert, M., … Zhu, L. (2018). Blockchains for Business Process Management—Challenges and Opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183367 
Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740618 
Monostori, L., Kádár, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., Sauer, O., Schuh, G., Sihn, W., & Ueda, K. (2016). Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Cirp Annals, 65(2), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005 
Neal, A. D., Sharpe, R. G., van Lopik, K., Tribe, J., Goodall, P., Lugo, H., Segura-Velandia, D., Conway, P., Jackson, L. M., & Jackson, T. W. (2021). The potential of industry 4.0 Cyber Physical System to improve quality assurance: An automotive case study for wash monitoring of returnable transit items. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 32, 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.07.002 
Pérez-Lara, M., Saucedo-Martínez, J. A., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E., & Vasant, P. (2020). Vertical and horizontal integration systems in Industry 4.0. Wireless Networks, 26, 4767–4775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1873-2 
Rialti, R., Marzi, G., Silic, M., & Ciappei, C. (2018). Ambidextrous organization and agility in big data era: The role of business process management systems. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2017-0210 
Ryalat, M., ElMoaqet, H., & AlFaouri, M. (2023). Design of a Smart Factory Based on Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet of Things towards Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042156 
Safar, L., Sopko, J., Bednar, S., & Poklemba, R. (2018). Concept of SME business model for industry 4.0 environment. Tem Journal, 7(3), 626. 
Schneider, M. H. G., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., & Dabić, M. (2024). Transform Me If You Can: Leveraging Dynamic Capabilities to Manage Digital Transformation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3319406 
Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., Pereira, V., & Malhotra, A. (2023). Guest editorial: (Un)physicalization (digitalization) of supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(5/6), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2023-551 
Somers, R. J., Douthwaite, J. A., Wagg, D. J., Walkinshaw, N., & Hierons, R. M. (2023). Digital-twin-based testing for cyber–physical systems: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 156, 107145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107145 
Trainor, K. J., Andzulis, J. M., Rapp, A., & Agnihotri, R. (2014). Social media technology usage and customer relationship performance: A capabilities-based examination of social CRM. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1201–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.002 
Trkman, P., & Klun, M. (2015). Leveraging social media for process innovation. A conceptual framework. BPM-Driving Innovation in a Digital World, 59–73. 
Tsakalidis, G., & Vergidis, K. (2024). Business Process Redesign: A Systematic Review of Evaluation Approaches Prior to Implementation. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024889 
Van Looy, A. (2021). A quantitative and qualitative study of the link between business process management and digital innovation. Information & Management, 58(2), 103413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103413 
vom Brocke, J., Baier, M.-S., Schmiedel, T., Stelzl, K., Röglinger, M., & Wehking, C. (2020). Context-aware business process management: Method assessment and selection. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00685-0 
Weber, I., Xu, X., Riveret, R., Governatori, G., Ponomarev, A., & Mendling, J. (2016). Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain. Business Process Management: 14th International Conference, BPM 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 18-22, 2016. Proceedings 14, 329–347. 
Zhang, J., Deng, C., Zheng, P., Xu, X., & Ma, Z. (2021). Development of an edge computing-based cyber-physical machine tool. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 67, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102042