Author guidelines

This journal only publishes commissioned content, please do not submit speculative manuscripts.

Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

  1. Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.
  2. AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.
  3. AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

Copywriting (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not permitted.

Copy-editing (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the following overarching principles.

Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

Submit to the journal

  • Each article should be around 800 - 1,300 words long and should be typed in single-line spacing with standard margins. However, an exceptional article could go up to 1,500 words.
  • It is important that the article focuses on an area of strategy, leadership, management, etc.
  • Get to the point straight away. You do not need to "introduce" such and such, covering "the following six areas". Let the material speak for itself.
  • Please ensure that the article does not sound like an advertorial for a company. Blatantly promotional material will not be published.
  • Where possible, avoid technical jargon. Many of the readers are in non-English-speaking countries. Use USA spelling and other conventions e.g. 'organization' not 'organisation'.
  • Keep paragraphs short and sentences short and uncomplicated.
  • Use bullet point paragraphs for action points. Start each bullet point with lower case, and separate each bullet point with a semi-colon.
  • Use subheadings to break up the text.
  • Keep references to a minimum – no more than 5 – this is not meant to be a heavy academic journal
  • Please indicate a one-line heading with a second line providing a development on the main heading. For example, if the text is about a particular approach and it is used in a specific company this could look as follows:

    Developing knowledge workers on the factory floor
    The case of ABB-Alamo
     
  • Alternatively, the second line could add a comment to the main heading, for example:

    The manager's role in coaching
    Overcoming barriers to success
     
  • Please also submit a head and shoulders photograph, and any images you wish to accompany the article.

Submissions to Strategic Direction are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts, the online submission and the peer review system. Registration and access is available at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/stratIf you are unable to find the information you need in the author guidelines or our author resources (http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/index.htm) section, please email [email protected] for assistance. Please quote the journal name, your contact details and the information you require.

Registering on ScholarOne Manuscripts

If you have not yet registered on ScholarOne Manuscripts, please follow the instructions below:

  • Please log on to: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/strat
  • Click on Create Account
  • Follow the on-screen instructions, filling in the requested details before proceeding
  • Your username will be your email address and you have to input a password of at least 8 characters in length and containing two or more numbers
  • Click Finish and your account has been created.

Submitting an article to Strategic Direction on ScholarOne Manuscripts

  • Please log on to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/strat with your username and password. This will take you through to the Welcome page (To consult the Author Guidelines for this journal, click on the Home Page link in the Resources column)
  • Click on the Author Centre button
  • Click on the submit a manuscript link which will take you through to the Manuscript Submission page
  • Complete all fields and browse to upload your article
  • When all required sections are completed, preview your .pdf proof
  • Submit your manuscript

The submission process

All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.

The only way to submit to the journal is through the journal’s ScholarOne site as accessed via the Emerald website, and not by email or through any third-party agent/company, journal representative, or website. Submissions should be done directly by the author(s) through the ScholarOne site and not via a third-party proxy on their behalf.

A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.

Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.

Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.

Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier.

Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.

Review process

Each paper is reviewed by the editor, and if it is judged suitable for this publication, the editor will decide whether the paper should be accepted as is, revised or rejected. Second opinions may be taken from experts in the field and the Editorial Advisory Board. Strategic Direction reserves the right to decide at any point not to publish an article, even after it has been accepted.

Frequently Asked Questions

The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article-processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal), and never at submission.

Read about our APCs

At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication, processing, or review. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email that appears to be from Emerald, the journal, or a third party, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our support team via [email protected].

Editorial team
  • Editor

  • Commissioning Editor

  • Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Editorial Advisory Board

    • Dr David Antonioni
      Executive Education - USA
    • Professor Ian Cunningham
      Strategic Developments International - UK
    • Mr J Paul Dittmann
      Whirlpool Corporation - USA
    • Pankaj Ghemawat
      IESE Business School - Spain
    • Gary Hamel
      Strategos - UK
    • Mr William E Hess
      Senco Products Inc. - USA
    • Professor Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries
      INSEAD Global Leadership Center - France
    • Dr. Derrick Kon
      CEO Solutions Pte Ltd - Singapore
    • Mr Roger E Levien
      Strategy & Innovation Consulting - USA
    • Dr. Rajesh K. Pillania
      Management Development Institute, Gurgaon - India
    • B Joseph Pine II
      Strategic Horizons LLP - USA
    • Professor Yoko Sano
      Kaetsu University - Japan
    • Dr Naoto Sasaki
      DBL-Group - Bangladesh
    • Dr Christian Stadler
      University of Bath - UK
    • Professor Mark Thomas
      Grenoble Ecole de Management - France
  • In Memoriam

    • Martin Fojt, 1960 - 2014
      UK
Indexing & metrics

Publication timeline

Time to first decision

9

days

Time to first decision

9

days

Further information

Time to first decision, expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025

Acceptance to publication

16

days

Acceptance to publication

16

days

Further information

Acceptance to publication, expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal. 

 

Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated April 2025)

Acceptance rate

100

%

Acceptance rate

100

%

Further information

The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025.


Usage

Downloads

9327

Articles

Downloads

9327

Articles

Further information

This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months

 

(Last updated: April 2025)

Reviewers

Reviewer information


Peer review process

This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Vision

Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.

Values

The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.

Ethics

All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.


Resources to guide you through the review process

Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.

More reviewer information


Strategic Direction is an essential management information resource for today's strategic thinkers.

ISSN: 0258-0543
eISSN: 1758-8588

Aims and scope

As a unique service, we scan through the best 400 management journals in the world and distil the most topical management issues and relevant implications for senior managers out of cutting-edge research.

We regularly present case study reviews of the Fortune 500 companies. Each briefing (no more than 2 to 3 pages long) is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the arguments in context.

Unique attributes

Strategic Direction offers CEOs powerful advantages by briefing them on the key ideas and major issues affecting business today.

Topicality

As the business environment becomes more competitive, the quality of strategic thinking demonstrated by an organization can become a measure of its success. This journal is the first of its kind, built solely around the needs of the CEOs and their strategy teams, and is an essential tool in the conception and implementation of powerful strategies.

Top cited

These are the top cited articles for this journal, from the last 12 months according to Crossref (Last updated: April 2025)

This title is aligned with our responsible management goal

We aim to champion researchers, practitioners, policymakers and organisations who share our goals of contributing to a more ethical, responsible and sustainable way of working.

SDG 1 No poverty
SDG 2 Zero hunger
SDG 8 Decent work & economic growth
SDG 9 Industry, innovation & infrastructure
SDG 10 Reduced inequalities
SDG 11 Sustainable cities & communities
SDG 12 Responsible consumption & production
SDG 13 Climate action
Find out about our responsible management goal