From bedside to cloudside: When innovation meets vulnerability

Author: Polianna Albuquerque, Charles Darwin University, Australia

What are the risks when algorithms meet human vulnerability?

It sounds like science fiction, but it is our reality. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare education is unpredictable. For thousands of years, medicine has pursued innovation, yet today we fear losing critical thinking and with it, the essence of caring: the relationship between patient and healthcare worker.
A continuous commitment to lifelong learning, self-improvement, and critical reflection is essential for promoting health. Yet as AI permeates classrooms and clinical settings, educators often find themselves supervising tools that learners may already be more adept at using (1). The challenge is to motivate students to evaluate evidence critically, reflect from their own perspectives, and use AI under the best educational practices.

The paradox of innovation

Health sciences have never stood still. Archaeological findings suggest that long before labs and microscopes, primitive trepanation was performed, drilling holes in the skull as an early form of neurosurgery (2). Ancient Egyptians combined medicine and magic, but still described anatomy in surprising detail (2).
Civilisations across the globe contributed: Ayurveda in India, traditional Chinese medicine, and the Greek separation of medicine from superstition. Later, Islamic scholars such as Avicenna preserved and expanded Greek knowledge. Modern medicine (16th to 19th centuries) advanced with anatomy, physiology, pathology, and germ theory (Pasteur, Koch) (3).
The 20th century added antibiotics, vaccines, radiology, organ transplantation, genomics, and now AI. Despite these shifts, one constant remains: the deep human connection between patient and healthcare worker.

What AI cannot replace

Healthcare is a paradoxical space — of joy and sorrow, hope and despair, cure and grief. AI cannot dive into the subjectivity of human vulnerability. This truth was captured in Sir Luke Fildes’ 1891 painting The Doctor, a poignant depiction of compassion and presence that no algorithm could replicate (4).

Challenges in education

In medical education, the collision between AI and human vulnerability brings challenges. Learners are often quicker than educators to adopt AI tools. Teachers must therefore balance innovation with guidance, encouraging curiosity and critical thinking while ensuring AI supports, not replaces, deep learning (5–7).

Mentoring in the AI era

Mentoring is now more crucial than ever. It guides, challenges, and supports students, aligning outcomes with the knowledge, skills, and behaviours required of graduates. Mentors provide advice, facilitate networking, and offer support during difficult times (8–10).
For mentorship to be effective, it must be systematically designed, theory-informed, and rigorously evaluated (11). Structured feedback, regular assessments, and investment in mentor training are vital for improving both education and patient care (12).

Balancing technology and human values

AI can optimise cognitive processes and enhance comprehension, but educators must scaffold its use with critical thinking frameworks (1). Empathy, compassion, and ethical principles remain irreplaceable. As Hippocrates reminded us, non-maleficence, beneficence, confidentiality, and respect for mentors must always guide healthcare (13).

The challenge is not to resist AI, but to ensure innovation never eclipses humanity.

Author Bio: Polianna Albuquerque, M.D., Ph.D., Coordinator of Portfolio and Mentoring Program, Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Australia

References

1. Abdulnour RE, Gin B, Boscardin CK. Educational Strategies for Clinical Supervision of Artificial Intelligence Use. N Engl J Med. 2025;393(8):786-97.
2. Metwaly AM, Ghoneim MM, Eissa IH, Elsehemy IA, Mostafa AE, Hegazy MM, et al. Traditional ancient Egyptian medicine: A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28(10):5823-32.
3. Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, Piao G. The Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine from Natural Products. Molecules. 2016;21(5).
4. Steensma DP, Kyle RA. Luke Fildes and The Doctor. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(11):e131-e2.
5. Kai Siang Chan NZ. Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review. JMIR Medical Education. 2019;5(1):e13930.
6. Talvacy Chaves de Freitas JdSL. Freire’s Pedagogy of Autonomy and Castells’ Mass Self-Communication in strengthening student protagonism in hybrid education during the pandemic. Intercom - RBCC. 2021;44:145-58.
7. Zulaikha Khairuddin NSS, Azrin Raimi Ahmad, Nur Adibah Zamri, Siti Nurshafezan Ahmad. Students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) tools as academic support. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2024;9(11).
8. Shah N, Gupta P, Singh T. Mentoring the Students for Competency-Based Medical Education: What, Why, and How? Indian Pediatr. 2025.
9. Ehsanian V, Derijani F, Khorraminia M, Eiliaei S. Implementation and evaluation of a mentoring and counselling program for medical students at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):940.
10. Ramani S, Kusurkar RA, Lyon-Maris J, Pyorala E, Rogers GD, Samarasekera DD, et al. Mentorship in health professions education – an AMEE guide for mentors and mentees: AMEE Guide No. 167. Med Teach. 2024;46(8):999-1011.
11. Abdelmannan D, Buhumaid R, Salman H, Ba Madhaf WAAH, AlRajaby HMK, Zary N, Guraya SS. A scoping review of mentorship in Graduate Medical Education: a proposed conceptual framework. Front Med. 2025;12.
12. Leong JR, Lim AYD, Ravindran N, Wan DWJ, Rajalingam V, Lua JK, et al. A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):1110.
13. Shetty N. Medical Ethics and Law. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57(11):1744-7.