A space for you
We’ve created this space as a collaborative area of our site, where we can share information about the things you’ve told us are important to you.
You can get in touch with us by sending an email to [email protected]
For researchers & authors
For librarians
The librarian corner
Find out about some of the key themes, trends and challenges in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field.
Talk to us…
We’d love to hear from you about the things you’d like to see here or the support you’d like to have. We’re also always open to collaboration from people within academia. Send an email to [email protected]
Are you in?
Our sector makes an incredible difference to the world, but it’s shrouded in unhelpful traditions, outdated measures of impact and barriers to participation.
Will you join us in working towards a fairer, more equitable environment where research can have a real-world impact and those within it can reach their full potential?
Comments
Join the conversation
Please ask any questions, add your opinion or simply share your thoughts. Report a problem.Can I become part of it now?
Please suggest.
Thanks for great information I was looking for this info for my mission.
\This isto you inform you that I am research scholar in Department of commerce, I would like to publish my articles in your esteemed publication. So, kindly help to do this. I am expecting your favourable reply as soon as possible.
thanking you
D.velumani, research scholar, Department of commerce, Nehru Memorial college, Triuchirappalli, Tamil NaDU.
Best,
Dhouha
Thank you for always being thoughtful
Marie (Aurélie)
I feel Emerald requesting the corresponding author and other co-authors to start justifying any added author during the manuscript review is not necessary. It was a concluded process before the paper's acceptance. The authors would have agreed that the contribution of the person (co-author) added during the review worth it and that should be accepted by the publisher. This is just a concern. Thanks.
comments