You can publish an open access article in this diamond partnership journal. Authors in this journal are not required to pay an article processing charge (APC)

Author guidelines

Submit to the journal

When submitting a manuscript, authors will be taken to a service called Paperpal Preflight, an AI-driven tool that checks manuscripts against the journal's author guidelines. Authors are free to use or bypass this step and submit directly to ScholarOne.

Submissions to RAUSP Management Journal are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts, the online submission and peer review system. Registration and access is available at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rausp. Full information and guidance on using ScholarOne Manuscripts is available at the Emerald ScholarOne Manuscripts Support Centre: http://mchelp.manuscriptcentral.com/gethelpnow.

***From January 1st 2022, original manuscripts must be submitted only in English.***

Any manuscript that has been rejected by RAUSP Management Journal may not be revised and resubmitted without an invitation from the editors.

Registering on ScholarOne Manuscripts

If you have not yet registered on ScholarOne Manuscripts, please follow the instructions below:

  • Please log on to: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rausp
  • Click on "Create Account"
  • Follow the on-screen instructions, filling in the requested details before proceeding
  • Your username will be your email address and you have to input a password of at least 8 characters in length and containing two or more numbers
  • Click "Finish" and your account will have been created.

Submitting an article to RAUSP on ScholarOne Manuscripts

IMPORTANT – The journal requires that all authors (both the corresponding and co-authors) have a valid ORCiD in order to publish. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that all relevant ORCiDs are captured. In order to obtain your ORCiD, please follow this link: https://orcid.org/register

  • Please log on to RAUSP at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rausp with your username and password. This will take you through to the welcome page (to consult the Author Guidelines for this journal, click on the homepage link in the "Resources" column)
  • Click on the "Author Centre" button
  • Click on the "Submit a manuscript" link which will take you through to the manuscript submission page
  • Submitting authors are required to confirm the contributions of all authors to the paper at the 'Author Contribution- CRediT Taxonomy' stage
  • Complete all fields and browse to "Upload your article"
  • When all required sections are completed, preview your PDF proof
  • Submit your manuscript.

Authors submitting papers for publication should specify which section of the journal they wish their paper to be considered for: "Research Papers" or "Viewpoints", etc. The editors and publisher will do everything possible to ensure that the manuscripts are dealt with promptly and that those which are accepted are quickly published.

Review process

Each paper submitted is reviewed by at least two external reviewers and the editors to assess its suitability to the journal. All manuscripts which format does not follow the guidelines indicated below will be rejected without further consideration.

Copyright

Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see Emerald's originality guidelines for details. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty.

The editor may make use of iThenticate software for checking the originality of submissions received.

This is an open access journal. All works are published under Creative Commons CC-BY license  which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.

View the license in more detail.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

  • Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
  • Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity
  • Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
  • Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:
    • Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).
    • Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
    • In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work.
  • If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

1) Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.&

2) AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.

3) AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

Copywriting (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not permitted.

Copy-editing (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the following overarching principles.

Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

Third party copyright permissions

Prior to article submission, authors should clear permission to use any content that has not been created by them.

Failure to do so may lead to lengthy delays in publication. Emerald is unable to publish any article which has permissions pending. The rights Emerald requires are:

  1. Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
  2. Print and electronic rights.
  3. Worldwide English language rights.
  4. To use the material for the life of the work (i.e. there should be no time restrictions on the re-use of material e.g. a one-year licence).

When reproducing tables, figures or excerpts (of more than 250 words) from another source, it is expected that:

  1. Authors obtain the necessary written permission in advance from any third party owners of copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material, in their manuscript. Permission must also be cleared for any minor adaptations of any work not created by them.
  2. If an author adapts significantly any material, the author must inform the copyright holder of the original work.
  3. Authors obtain any proof of consent statements
  4. Authors must always acknowledge the source in figure captions and refer to the source in the reference list.
  5. Authors should not assume that any content which is freely available on the web is free to use. Authors should check the website for details of the copyright holder to seek permission for re-use.

Informed consent

If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Emerald supports the development of, and practical application of consistent ethical standards throughout the scholarly publishing community. All Emerald’s journals and editors are members of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which provides advice on all aspects of publication ethics. Emerald follows the Committee’s flowcharts in cases of research and publication misconduct, enabling journals to adhere to the highest ethical standards in publishing. Read more information on Emerald’s publication ethics policy.

Copyright forms

Upon acceptance of an article authors will be requested to sign a Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Publishing under a CC BY 4.0 license means:

  • Copyright in the article is retained by the author.
  • The author grants Emerald a licence to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
  • Your article can be shared freely, including copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
  • Your article can be adapted, remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Full attribution to the original work must be included in any derivatives, indicating if/where changes have been made.

Authors will be asked to complete the CC BY 4.0 licence through ScholarOne. All authors are sent an e-mail with links to the licence form, which they must check for accuracy and submit electronically.

Author fees

The journal is published under a Diamond Open Access arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the journal are funded by University of São Paulo. This journal does not charge APCs or submission charges.

Emerald Editing Service

Emerald is pleased to partner with Peerwith to provide editorial support for authors wishing to submit papers to Emerald journals. Peerwith is a platform for author services, connecting academics seeking support for their work with the relevant expert who can help out with language editing and translation, visuals, consulting, or anything else academics need to get their research submission-ready.

Final submission

The author must ensure that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct and without spelling or typographical errors. Before submitting, authors should check their submission completeness using the available Article Submission Checklist. Proofs will be e-mailed prior to publication.

Archiving policy

Emerald provides perpetual access for all e-journal and book content by working with digital preservation schemes Portico, LOCKSS and CLOCKSS. Read further information on Emerald’s archiving policy.

Manuscript requirements

The journal's policy is open access and creative commons. Authors retain their rights to republish this material in other works written or edited by them, subject to full acknowledgement of the original source of publication.

Please prepare your manuscript before submission, using the following guidelines:


Format
Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format. LaTex files can be used if an accompanying PDF document is provided. PDF as a sole file type is not accepted, a PDF must be accompanied by the source file. Acceptable figure file types are listed further below.
Cover LetterIt is a mandatory requirement of this journal that all submissions should be accompanied by a covering letter. The letter should clearly outline the scope of your work, highlighting areas of impact and relevance for the journal’s readership.
Article length

Articles should be a maximum of 7,000 words in length. This includes all text including references and appendices. Please allow 280 words for each figure or table.

(For instance, if an article has 6,000 words and two tables, then the total sum of words will be: 6,000 + 280 + 280 = 6,560 words)

Article titleA title of not more than eight words should be provided.
Author details

The maximum number of authors allowed per submission is 6 authors. All contributing authors’ names should be added to the ScholarOne submission, and their names arranged in the correct order for publication. IMPORTANT- all authors (both the corresponding and co-authors) are required to have a valid ORCiD in order to publish in this journal. Submitting authors should ensure that all relevant ORCiDs are captured as part of the submission process. In order to obtain your ORCiD, please follow this link: https://orcid.org/register

  • Correct e-mail addresses should be supplied for each author in their separate author accounts
  • The full name of each author must be present in their author account in the exact format they should appear for publication, including or excluding any middle names or initials as required
  • The affiliation of each contributing author should be correct in their individual author account. The affiliation listed should be where they were based at the time that the research for the paper was conducted
  • All authors are required to confirm their contribution to the research as part of the ‘Author Contribution- CRediT Taxonomy’ stage of the submission process.
Biographies and acknowledgementsAuthors who wish to include these items should save them together in an MS Word file to be uploaded with the submission. If they are to be included, a brief professional biography of not more than 100 words should be supplied for each named author.
Structured abstract

Authors must supply a structured abstract in their submission, both via the online submission system and within the Word document as per the below sub-headings (see our "How to... write an abstract" guide for practical help and guidance):

  • Purpose (mandatory)
  • Design/methodology/approach (mandatory)
  • Findings (mandatory)
  • Research implications (mandatory)
  • Practical implications (mandatory)
  • Social implications (mandatory)
  • Originality/value (mandatory)

Maximum is 250 words in total (including keywords and article classification, see below).

Authors should avoid the use of personal pronouns within the structured abstract and body of the paper (e.g. "this paper investigates..." is correct, "I investigate..." is incorrect).

KeywordsAuthors should provide appropriate and short keywords in the ScholarOne submission that encapsulate the principal topics of the paper (see the How to... ensure your article is highly downloaded guide for practical help and guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords). The maximum number of keywords is 12.

Whilst Emerald will endeavour to use submitted keywords in the published version, all keywords are subject to approval by Emerald’s in house editorial team and may be replaced by a matching term to ensure consistency.
Article classification

Authors must categorize their paper as part of the ScholarOne submission process. The category which most closely describes their paper should be selected from the list below:

Research paper. Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), applying quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods, including: the construction or testing of a model or framework; action research; testing of data, market research or surveys; empirical, scientific or clinical research.

Conceptual paper. Emphasizes the development of hypotheses or propositions and is typically discursive in nature. These manuscripts do not utilize empirical data and may include philosophical discussions or comparative analyses of existing literature. Conceptual papers are published exclusively by invitation.

General review. Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive. Our focus is on papers that present and/or discuss the use of methods for the audience of management-related fields.

ThinkBox. This essay-style text is characterized by critical analysis, theoretical grounding, and often a provocative nature. Articles published in this format are primarily based on the author's interpretation and position, and are published by invitation only. Unlike traditional empirical articles, they do not aim to present research results with data collection, but rather to develop in-depth analyses and reflections on relevant topics.

RAUSP Management Journal does not publish literature reviews, including systematic literature reviews (SLRs) and bibliometric studies. 

Notes/EndnotesNotes or Endnotes should be used only if absolutely necessary and must be identified in the text by consecutive numbers, enclosed in square brackets and listed at the end of the article.
Figures

All Figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, web pages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted in electronic form. 

All Figures should be of high quality, legible and numbered consecutively with arabic numerals. Graphics may be supplied in colour to facilitate their appearance on the online database.

  • Figures created in MS Word, MS PowerPoint, MS Excel, Illustrator should be supplied in their native formats. Electronic figures created in other applications should be copied from the origination software and pasted into a blank MS Word document or saved and imported into an MS Word document or alternatively create a .pdf file from the origination software.
  • Figures which cannot be supplied as above are acceptable in the standard image formats which are: .pdf, .ai, and .eps. If you are unable to supply graphics in these formats then please ensure they are .tif, .jpeg, or .bmp at a resolution of at least 300dpi and at least 10cm wide.
  • To prepare web pages/screenshots simultaneously press the "Alt" and "Print screen" keys on the keyboard, open a blank Microsoft Word document and simultaneously press "Ctrl" and "V" to paste the image. (Capture all the contents/windows on the computer screen to paste into MS Word, by simultaneously pressing "Ctrl" and "Print screen".)

Photographic images should be submitted electronically and of high quality. They should be saved as .tif or .jpeg files at a resolution of at least 300dpi and at least 10cm wide. Digital camera settings should be set at the highest resolution/quality possible.

TablesTables should be typed and included in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the body text of article with corresponding labels being clearly shown in the separate file. 

Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have corresponding explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.
Supplementary files

Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content-hosting platform (this is Emerald's recommended option as we are able to ensure the data remain accessible), or on an alternative trusted online repository.

Emerald recommends authors that they use the following two trusted lists of repositories: https://commons.datacite.org/repositories and https://www.re3data.org to identify the most suitable repository. Any and all supplementary material must be present/provided with the initial submission.

If you choose to host your supplementary files on Insight, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format 'Supplementary_material_appendix_1' or 'Supplementary tables'. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article; there is no need to include the content of the file only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of publication.

Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copy-edited or typeset, and authors will not receive proofs of this content. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.
Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:

  • Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
  • MS Word document (.doc, .docx)
  • MS Excel (.xls, xlsx)
  • MS PowerPoint (.pptx)
  • Image (.png, .jpeg, .gif)
  • Plain ASCII text (.txt)
  • PostScript (.ps)
  • Rich Text Format (.rtf)

If you choose to use an alternative trusted online repository, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available. Where an alternative trusted online repository is used, the files hosted should always be presented as read-only; please be aware that such usage risks compromising your anonymity during the review process if the repository contains any information that may enable the reviewer to identify you; as such, we recommend that all links to alternative repositories are reviewed carefully prior to submission.

Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).

Appendix

Supplementary information should be presented in an appendix and placed before the reference section.

All funding sources must be mentioned, including funding organizations and numbers of grants and other vehicles of funding. This material may be placed in the Acknowledgements (see below).

References

References to other publications must be in APA style and carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency. This is very important in an electronic environment because it enables your readers to exploit the Reference Linking facility on the database and link back to the works you have cited through CrossRef.

Invert all authors’ names; give surnames and initials for up to and including seven authors. When authors number eight or more, include the first six authors’ names, then insert three ellipsis points, and add the last author’s name. For example:

Gilbert, D. G., McClernon, J. F., Rabinovich, N. E., Sugai, C., Plath, L. C., Asgaard, G., … Botros, N. (2004). Effects of quitting smoking on EEG activation and attention last for more than 31 days and are more severe with stress, dependence, DRD2 A 1 allele, and depressive traits. Nicotine and Tobacco Research6, 249–267. doi:1 0.1 080/1462220041 0001676305.

For references with the same surname and initials but different first name provide the first name as follows:

  •  
    • Janet, P. [Paul]. (1876). La notion de la personnalité [The notion of personality]. Revue Scientifique, 10, 574–575.
    • Janet, P. [Pierre]. (1906). The pathogenesis of some impulsions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1, 1–17.

Text citation to be given as follows: (Paul Janet, 1876) (Pierre Janet, 1906)

For references of two or more primary authors with the same surname, include the first author's initials in all text citations, even if the year of publication differs.

  •  
    • Light, I. (2006). Deflecting immigration: Networks, markets, and regulation in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Light, M. A., & Light, I. H. (2008). The geographic expansion of Mexican immigration in the United States and its implications for local law enforcement. Law Enforcement Executive Forum Journal8, 73–82.

Examples of text citation: Among studies, we review M.A. Light and Light (2008). I. Light (2006) studies this concept.

If two references of more than three surnames with the same year shorten to the same form e.g. both Ireys, Chernoff, DeVet, & Kim, 2001, and Ireys, Chernoff, Stein, DeVet, & Silver, 2001 shorten to Ireys et al., 2001)

Then cite the surnames of the first authors and of as many of the subsequent authors as necessary to distinguish the two references, followed by a comma and et al.:

Ireys, Chernoff, DeVet, et al. (2001) and Ireys, Chernoff, Stein, et al. (2001)

  • Do not include personal communications, such as letters, memoranda, and informal electronic communications in references but do cite these in the text. Examples of a citation of personal communication are: (V. G. Nguyen, personal communication, September 28, 1999); T. K. Lutes (personal communication, April 18, 2001).

Use Arabic numerals even if some volume numbers of books and journals are given in roman numerals (e.g. Vol. 3 not Vol. III).

Examples of references: Journals:
  • Burns, P. (2002a). The intergovernmental regime: A public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs24(7), 55–73.
  • Burns, P. (2002b). The intergovernmental regime: A public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs24(September), 55–73.
  • Burns, P. (2002). The intergovernmental regime: A public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs24(Autumn), 55–73.
  • Burns, P. (in press-a). The intergovernmental regime: A public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs24(7), 55–73.
  • Burns, P., & Johanson, R. (Eds.). (2002). The intergovernmental regime: A public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs24(7), 55–73.
Books:
  • Alexander, C. F. (1996). The theory and practice of Ku Klux Klan in the southwest. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
  • Alexander, C. F. (1996). The theory and practice of Ku Klux Klan in the southwest [Brochure]. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Statement on auditing standards no. 99: Consideration of fraud in a financial audit. New York, NY: AICPA.
  • Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality: Psychological aspects (2nd ed., pp. 34–48). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). (1993). London: Merriam-Webster.
  • Citation: (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 1993). 
Edited Books:
  • Bridges, A., Burns, B., & Cash, A. (1989). Becoming an American: The working classes in the United States before the Civil War. In I. Katezelson & A. Zolvo (Eds.), Working class formationA subject class (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 110–125). Princeton, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bridges, A., & Burns, B. (with Cash, C. A.) (1989). Becoming an American: The working classes in the United States before the Civil War. In I. Katezelson (Ed.), Working class formationA subject class (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 110–125). London: City University.
  • Bridges, A., Burns, B., & Cash, A. (Eds.). (1989). Becoming an American: The working classes in the United States before the Civil War. In Working class formationA subject class (2nd ed., Vol. 6, p. 125). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In K. Wolff (Ed. & Trans.), The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press (Original work published in 1908).
PHD Thesis
  • Lowe, R. (1967). Racial segregation in Indiana. Ph.D. thesis, Ball State University, Munice, IN, USA.
Dissertation
  • Sinaceur, M. (2006). Suspending judgments to create value: Suspicion, distrust and trust in negotiations. Dissertation, Stanford University
Proceedings
  • Chalmers, D. (1965). Becoming an American in today’s world. In I. Katezelson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference meeting, Bronx, Germany (pp. 1–27).
Unpublished data
  • Chalmers, D. (1965). Racial segregation in Indiana. Unpublished data. Department of Biotechnology, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Translation
  • John, A., Williams, R., & Monste, E. (2000). Article title in German. Journal name in German. [Translation of Journal Name in English.], 47, 1–10.
Book Translation
  • John, A., Williams, R., & Monste, E. (2000). In H. Johanson & K. Mark (Trans.), Book name in French (pp. 1–20). [Book name in English.] Place: Publisher
Book Series
  • John, A., Williams, R., & Monste, E. (2000). Article title. In T. Monste (Ed.), Book name. Book Title Series. Place: Publisher
Technical Report
  • Bonn, M. (2000). Racial segregation in Indiana. Technical Report no. 29876765. University of Wisconsin, WI, USA.
  • Author, A. (2001). Article title. Technical Report. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin 1897287. University of Wisconsin, WI, USA.
  • Armstrong, J., Deeble, J., Dror, D. M., Rice, N., Thiede, M., & Van de Ven, W. P. M. M. (2004, February 16). The International Review Panel report to the South African Risk Equalization Fund Task Group. Retrieved from http://www.medicalschemes.com/publications/publications.aspx?catid=23. Accessed on March 9, 2007.
  • Armstrong, J., Deeble, J., & Dror, D. M. (2004, February 16). The International Review Panel report to the South African Risk Equalization Fund Task Group. Retrieved from http://www.medicalschemes.com/publications/publications.aspx?catid=23. Accessed on March 9
Working paper, mimeo, discussion paper
  • John, A. (2000). Article title. Working Paper No. 1897287. University of Wisconsin, WI.
  • John, A. (2001). Article title. Working Paper. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin 1897287. University of Wisconsin, WI.
  • Bonn, M. (2000). Racial segregation in Indiana. Discussion paper. University of Wisconsin, WI.
Paper presented
  • John, A., Williams, R., & Monste, E. (2000). Value and the world economy today. Paper presented at the International Association of Conflict Management, Seville, Spain.
  • Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., Loyd, D. L., & Lount, R. B., Jr. (2005). The conflict between how we feel and how we think: Affective and cognitive reactions to disagreement from socially similar and dissimilar others. Paper presented at Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
Newspaper article
  • New York Times. (1980). Article title. New York Times, June 12, p. 168.
    John, R. (1990). Article title. New York Times, June 12, p. 45.
Manuscript submitted
  • Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Young, R. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., Capps, L. M., & Tauer, J. T. (1999). The pleasures of talking trash: Development, social status, and teasing. Unpublished manuscript.
URL
DOI
  • Schiraldi, G. R. (2001). The post-traumatic stress disorder sourcebook: A guide to healing, recovery, and growth [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi:10.1036/0071393
Editorial team
  • Editor-in-Chief

    • Leandro dos Santos Maciel
      Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
      [email protected]
    • Rafaela Almeida Cordeiro
      School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
      [email protected]
  • Editorial Assistant

  • Indexing Consultant

  • Communication Consultant

  • Associate Editor

    • Amruta Deshpande
      Indira University, Índia
    • Angela Christina Lucas
      Campinas State University, Limeira, Brazil
    • Barbara Galleli
      Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • Diana Cruz Rodrigues
      Universidade da Amazônia, Brasil
    • Diogo Helal
      Fundação Joaquim Nabuco, Brasil
    • Edison Simoni
      FECAP University Center, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Faris Nasif Al-Shubairi
      Dhofar University, Omã
    • Fernanda Muller
      Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
    • Flávio Hourneaux Junior
      Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    • Flávio Luiz de Moraes Barboza
      Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brasil
    • Germano Glufke Reis
      Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • Gustavo Picanço Dias
      Universidade Federal do Piauí, Brasil
    • Harpreet Kaur
      Christ University, índia
    • Hsia Hua Sheng
      Getulio Vargas Foundation, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Jay Daniel
      University of Derby, England
    • Jussara Jéssica Pereira
      UFMG Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brazil
    • Lucas Amaral
      IESEG School of Management, France
    • Luciana Campos Lima
      INSPER Institute of Education and Research, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da Cruz
      João Pinheiro Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
    • Mariana Costa Silveira
      Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
    • Miguel Torres
      University of Kent, UK
    • Muriel Fadairo
      University Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France
    • Otávio Freire
      University of São Paulo (EACH-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
    • Paula Infantes
      University of Groningen, Países Baixos
    • Paula Sarita Bigio Schnaider
      University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
    • Rafaela Gjergji
      Università Cattaneo, Itália
    • Sachin K. Mangla
      O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India
    • Samuel Façanha Câmara
      Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Brasil
    • Simone R. Barakat
      FECAP University Center, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Ticiana de Vicenzi
      Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
    • Violeta Sun
      University of São Paulo (EACH-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
    • Wilson Toshiro Nakamura
      Mackenzie Presbiterian University, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Publisher

  • Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Scientific Editorial Board

    • Anabella Davila
      EGADE Business School Monterrey, Monterrey, México
    • Anna Grandori
      Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
    • Danny Pimentel Claro
      Institute of Education and Research (INSPER), São Paulo, Brazil
    • David Hyungseok Yoon
      University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    • Diego Finchelstein
      Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Fredrik Tell
      Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
      [email protected]
    • Heitor Almeida
      University of Illinois, Illinois, United States
    • Ian O. Williamson
      Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
    • Joseph F. Jr Hair
      University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States
    • Juana Catalina Garcia Duque
      Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
    • Keith Jackson
      University of London, London, United Kingdom
    • Lourdes Casanova
      Cornell University, New York, United States
    • Luiz F. Mesquita
      Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • Manuel Rocha Armada
      University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
    • Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez
      Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
    • Maria Tereza Leme Fleury
      Getulio Vargas Foundation - Brazil
    • Marlei Pozzebon
      HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canadá
    • Ricardo Vinicius Jordão
      Swiss Management Center, Zug, Switzerland and The Center for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics, CEFAGE-EU, Faro, Portugal
    • Sergio Giovanetti Lazzarini
      Institute of Education and Research (INSPER), São Paulo, Brazil
    • Sergio Olavarrieta Soto
      Universidad de Chile, Santiago - Chile
    • Stelvia Matos
      University of Surrey - UK
    • Won-Ho Kim Hankuk
      University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea
Indexing & metrics

Citation metrics

Scopus Logo

4.5

CiteScore 2025

Scopus Logo

4.5

CiteScore 2025

Further information

CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

 

Scopus Logo

3.3

CiteScore Tracker 2026

(updated monthly)

Scopus Logo

3.3

CiteScore Tracker 2026

(updated monthly)

Further information

 CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.

 

The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

Clarivate analytics logo

2.2

2024 Impact Factor

Clarivate analytics logo

2.2

2024 Impact Factor

Further information

The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Clarivate Analytics. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.

 

For more information and methodology see Clarivate Analytics

Clarivate analytics logo

3.4

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Clarivate analytics logo

3.4

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Further information

A base of five years may be more appropriate for journals in certain fields because the body of citations may not be large enough to make reasonable comparisons, or it may take longer than two years to publish and distribute leading to a longer period before others cite the work.

 

Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics.


Publication timeline

Time to first decision

59

days

Time to first decision

59

days

Further information

Time to first decision, expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025

Acceptance to publication

55

days

Acceptance to publication

55

days

Further information

Acceptance to publication, expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal. 

 

Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated July 2024)

Acceptance rate

9.1

%

Acceptance rate

9.1

%

Further information

The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025.


Usage

Downloads

21530

Articles

Downloads

21530

Articles

Further information

This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months

 

(Last updated: April 2025)

This journal is included in the following abstract and indexing services:

  • ABCD USP – Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais da USP
  • Cabells
  • Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS)
  • Dare Databank UNESCO – SHS/DC
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCO Discovery Service
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
  • Google Scholar
  • IBBA – Índice Brasileiro de Bibliografia de Administração
  • Inspec
  • Latindex
  • ProQuest (Various databases)
  • REDALYC – Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina
  • SciELO
  • Scopus
  • Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL)
  • SUMÁRIOS – Sumários de Revistas Brasileiras
  • ULRICHSWEB – Global Serials Directory
  • WorldCat
Reviewers

Reviewer information


Peer review process

This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Vision

Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.

Values

The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.

Ethics

All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.


Resources to guide you through the review process

Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.

More reviewer information


Calls for papers & news

News

Thank you to our 2025 Reviewers - RAUSP Management Journal

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following for their invaluable service as 2025 reviewers for RAUSP Management Journal. We are very grateful for all the contributions made. It is with their help that the journal has been ...

17/03/2026
Thank you to our 2025 Reviewers - RAUSP Management Journal

RAUSP included in CABS

RAUSP is pleased to announce that the journal is now included in the Chartered Association of Business Schools 2021 Academic Journal Guide. CABS is  the voice of the UK’s business and management education sector. They support thei...

28/06/2021
RAUSP included in CABS

Literati awards

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2025

We are pleased to announce our 2025 Literati Award winners.Outstanding PaperSustainability communication in ma...

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2025

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2024

We are pleased to announce our 2024 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Identifying necessary conditions to deep-...

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2024
2023 literati award winners banner

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2023

We are pleased to announce our 2023 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Challenges of business models for sustainability in...

RAUSP Management Journal - Literati Award Winners 2023

RAUSP Management Journal publishes original research that provides significant theoretical contributions and practical insights across diverse management-related disciplines within the international management community. This open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal is published by Emerald on behalf of the University of São Paulo under a diamond open-access arrangement, in which USP funds all publishing costs.

ISSN: 2531-0488
eISSN: 2531-0488

You can publish an open access article in this diamond partnership journal. Authors in this journal are not required to pay an article processing charge (APC)

Aims and scope

RAUSP Management Journal is committed to advancing excellence in management scholarship and fostering positive social impact through the publication of original, high-quality research. We seek manuscripts that combine theoretical significance with methodological rigor, ensuring that each article contributes meaningfully to academic discourse and/or offers actionable insights for professional practice, ultimately benefiting society.

The journal encourages innovative contributions that employ quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, as well as conceptual papers and research from diverse management traditions.

The journal covers all fields of management, including:

  • Business ethics  
  • Consumer behavior and marketing
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Finance and accounting
  • Human resources and organizational behavior
  • Operations and supply chain management
  • Public management
  • Strategic management
  • Sustainability in management
  • Technology and innovation management 

***From January 1st 2022, original manuscripts must be submitted only in English.***

Please feel free to view a short video from an author, Prof Claude Menard, introducing his
research paper published in ThinkBox 53 (1), 3-10 of the journal entitled
"Research frontiers of new institutional economics"


Image: FEA USP.

RAUSP Management Journal is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of the University of Sao Paulo (USP) and it is owned by USP. RAUSP is published under a Diamond OA arrangement, in that all charges for publishing an OA article in RAUSP are funded by the University of São Paulo. There is no charge to the author.

 

Transparency statement for RAUSP Management Journal 

  1. Journal Ownership: RAUSP Management Journal is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of the University of Sao Paulo.
  2. Governing Body: The editorial team is appointed and managed by the University of Sao Paulo. The journal is governed by the editorial team in collaboration with Emerald Publishing.
  3. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double blind peer review model. All articles undergo an initial assessment by the journal editor. If they are considered suitable for consideration, articles will then be a reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers to assess suitability for publication. Final responsibility for editorial decisions rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal. 
  4. Editorial team/contact information: Contact details for the editorial team can be found on the journal homepage. Queries may also be directed to Emerald’s Publishing team as follows: 
    Alex Honour - [email protected]
  5. Copyright: All articles in the journal are published Open Access under a Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-4.0). This allows authors to retain copyright of their work whilst others can share, use and build upon this work created as long as appropriate attribution is given. 
  6. Author Fees: The journal is published under a Diamond Open Access arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the journal are funded by the University of Sao Paulo. There are currently no Article Processing Charges to the author(s).
  7. Allegations of Misconduct: All journals published by Emerald are members of and subscribe to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics. In the event of any allegation of research or publication misconduct the publisher and editor will adhere to COPE guidelines in dealing with such allegations. 
  8. Conflicts of interest: Authors are asked to declare any financial or ethical conflicts of interest upon submitting their work to the journal. Difficult cases will be referred to the Committee on Publishing Ethics (COPE) for advice.
  9. Frequency: The journal currently publishes 4 issues per annum
  10. Access: All journal articles are published Open Access on EmeraldInsight.com - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/rausp under a CCBY 4.0 licence (please see section 5). 
  11. Revenue sources: The journal is published under a Diamond Open Access arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the journal are funded by the University of Sao Paulo.
  12. Advertising: The journal does not accept direct advertising 
  13. Archiving: Emerald provides perpetual access for all e-journal content by working with digital preservation schemes Portico, LOCKSS and CLOCKSS. 
  14. Direct marketing: On occasion the journal will use direct marketing activities (primarily email campaigns) to raise awareness of the journal and to invite authors to submit articles.   Marketing activities are conducted by the University of Sao Paulo unless otherwise agreed with Emerald.  

 

This statement was updated by Alex Honour (Emerald Publishing) on 24th February 2025.