Author guidelines

Before you start

For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

  • Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
  • Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity
  • Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
  • Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:
    • Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).
    • Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
    • In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work.
  • If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

  1. Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.
  2. AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.
  3. AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

Copywriting (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not permitted.

Copy-editing (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the following overarching principles.

Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

Research and publishing ethics

Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

We have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

A few key points:

  • Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference paper policies.  If any substantial element of your paper has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received. This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works from 800 scholarly publishers.
  • Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under consideration by any other publication.
  • If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics guidelines.
  • By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.

Third party copyright permissions

Prior to article submission, you need to ensure you’ve applied for, and received, written permission to use any material in your manuscript that has been created by a third party. Please note, we are unable to publish any article that still has permissions pending. The rights we require are:

  • Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
  • Print and electronic rights.
  • Worldwide English-language rights.
  • To use the material for the life of the work. That means there should be no time restrictions on its re-use e.g. a one-year licence.

We are a member of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) and participate in the STM permissions guidelines, a reciprocal free exchange of material with other STM publishers.  In some cases, this may mean that you don’t need permission to re-use content. If so, please highlight this at the submission stage.

Please take a few moments to read our guide to publishing permissions to ensure you have met all the requirements, so that we can process your submission without delay.

Open access submissions and information

All our journals currently offer two open access (OA) publishing paths; gold open access and green open access.

If you would like to, or are required to, make the branded publisher PDF (also known as the version of record) freely available immediately upon publication, you can select the gold open access route once your paper is accepted.

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge). This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

Alternatively, if you would like to, or are required to, publish open access but your funding doesn’t cover the cost of the APC, you can choose the green open access, or self-archiving, route. As soon as your article is published, you can make the author accepted manuscript (the version accepted for publication) openly available, free from payment and embargo periods.

You can find out more about our open access routes, our APCs and waivers and read our FAQs on our open research page. 

Find out about open

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines

We are a signatory of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines, a framework that supports the reproducibility of research through the adoption of transparent research practices. That means we encourage you to:

  • Cite and fully reference all data, program code, and other methods in your article.
  • Include persistent identifiers, such as a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), in references for datasets and program codes. Persistent identifiers ensure future access to unique published digital objects, such as a piece of text or datasets. Persistent identifiers are assigned to datasets by digital archives, such as institutional repositories and partners in the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences (Data-PASS).
  • Follow appropriate international and national procedures with respect to data protection, rights to privacy and other ethical considerations, whenever you cite data. For further guidance please refer to our research and publishing ethics guidelines. For an example on how to cite datasets, please refer to the references section below.

Prepare your submission

Manuscript support services

We are pleased to partner with Editage, a platform that connects you with relevant experts in language support, translation, editing, visuals, consulting, and more. After you’ve agreed a fee, they will work with you to enhance your manuscript and get it submission-ready.

This is an optional service for authors who feel they need a little extra support. It does not guarantee your work will be accepted for review or publication.

Visit Editage

Manuscript requirements

Before you submit your manuscript, it’s important you read and follow the guidelines below. You will also find some useful tips in our structure your journal submission how-to guide.

Format

Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format

While you are welcome to submit a PDF of the document alongside the Word file, PDFs alone are not acceptable. LaTeX files can also be used but only if an accompanying PDF document is provided. Acceptable figure file types are listed further below.

Article length / word count

Articles should be between 9000 – 11,000 words in length at initial submission with a maximum of 12,000 words in the final accepted version. This includes all text, for example, the structured abstract, references, all text in tables, and figures and appendices. 

Please allow 280 words for each figure or table.

Article titleA concisely worded title should be provided. No more than 11 words to be in the title, we recommend titles that are appealing and interesting. See our  editorial, vol 30(5), for  details
Author details

The names of all contributing authors should be added to the ScholarOne submission; please list them in the order in which you’d like them to be published. Each contributing author will need their own ScholarOne author account, from which we will extract the following details:

  • Author email address (institutional preferred).
  • Author name. We will reproduce it exactly, so any middle names and/or initials they want featured must be included.
  • Author affiliation. This should be where they were based when the research for the paper was conducted.

In multi-authored papers, it’s important that ALL authors that have made a significant contribution to the paper are listed. Those who have provided support but have not contributed to the research should be featured in an acknowledgements section. You should never include people who have not contributed to the paper or who don’t want to be associated with the research. Read about our research ethics for authorship.

Biographies and acknowledgementsIf you want to include these items, save them in a separate Microsoft Word document and upload the file with your submission. Where they are included, a brief professional biography of not more than 100 words should be supplied for each named author.
Research fundingYour article must reference all sources of external research funding in the acknowledgements section. You should describe the role of the funder or financial sponsor in the entire research process, from study design to submission.
Structured abstract

All submissions must include a structured abstract, following the format outlined below.

These four sub-headings and their accompanying explanations must always be included:

  • Purpose
  • Design/methodology/approach
  • Findings
  • Originality

The following three sub-headings are optional and can be included, if applicable:

  • Research limitations/implications
  • Practical implications
  • Social implications


You can find some useful tips in our write an article abstract how-to guide.

The maximum length of your abstract should be 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification (see the sections below).

Keywords

Your submission should include up to 12 appropriate and short keywords that capture the principal topics of the paper. Our Creating an SEO-friendly manuscript how to guide contains some practical guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords.

Please note, while we will always try to use the keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure consistency across publications and improve your article’s visibility.

Article classification

During the submission process, you will be asked to select a type for your paper; the options are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

  • Article
  • Viewpoint
  • Commentary
  • Book Review
  • Executive Summary

You will also be asked to select a category for your paper. The options for this are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

Research paper. Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), including:

  • The construction or testing of a model or framework
  • Action research
  • Testing of data, market research or surveys
  • Empirical, scientific or clinical research
  • Papers with a practical focus

Viewpoint. Covers any paper where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation. This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces.

Technical paper. Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.

Conceptual paper. Focuses on developing hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers philosophical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ work and thinking.

Case study. Describes actual interventions or experiences within organizations. It can be subjective and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise.

Literature review. This category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular field. It could be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.

General review. Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.

Web appendixAdditional information may be included for both review and access alongside the published article. This appendix can contain literature tables and references for systematic literature reviews, full measurement instruments, and additional analysis. The content in the web appendix must not be central to the argument or rigour of the paper and should be referred to in the paper as (see web appendix). When submitting the web appendix, please classify the file as a Supplementary file for review.
Headings

Headings must be concise, with a clear indication of the required hierarchy. 

The preferred format is for first level headings to be in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium italics.

The required headings are:

Empirical papers:

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature Background or Literature review
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion (subheadings of theoretical contribution, managerial implications, limitations and further research)
  • Conclusion

Conceptual papers:

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature Background
  • Proposed framework/theory/model
  • Research Agenda
  • Conclusion
Notes/endnotesNotes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely necessary. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the end of the article.
Figures

All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and white files are accepted.

There are a few other important points to note:

  • All figures should be supplied at the highest resolution/quality possible with numbers and text clearly legible.
  • Acceptable formats are .ai, .eps, .jpeg, .bmp, and .tif.
  • Electronic figures created in other applications should be supplied in their original formats and should also be either copied and pasted into a blank MS Word document, or submitted as a PDF file.
  • All figures should be numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals and have clear captions.
  • All photographs should be numbered as Plate 1, 2, 3, etc. and have clear captions.
  • All figure/table captions should include the necessary credit line, acknowledgement, or attribution if you have been given permission to use the figure/table; if the figure/table is the property of the author(s), this should be acknowledged in the caption.
Tables

Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the main body of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown in the table file. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).

Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.

Supplementary files

Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content hosting platform, or on an institutional or personal repository. All supplementary material must be submitted prior to acceptance.

If you choose to host your supplementary files on Insight, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format ‘Supplementary_material_appendix_1’ or ‘Supplementary tables’. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article, there is no need to include the content of the file but only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.

Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copyedited, typeset, and authors will not receive proofs. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.

Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:

  • Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
  • MS Word document (.doc, .docx)
  • MS Excel (.xls, xlsx)
  • MS PowerPoint (.pptx)
  • Image (.png, .jpeg, .gif)
  • Plain ASCII text (.txt)
  • PostScript (.ps)
  • Rich Text Format (.rtf)

If you choose to use an institutional or personal repository, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available.

Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).

References

All references in your manuscript must be formatted using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted – we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your citations for completeness, accuracy and consistency.

Emerald’s Harvard referencing style

References to other publications in your text should be written as follows:

  • Single author: (Adams, 2006)
  • Two authors: (Adams and Brown, 2006)
  • Three or more authors: (Adams et al., 2006) Please note, ‘et al' should always be written in italics.

A few other style points. These apply to both the main body of text and your final list of references.

  • When referring to pages in a publication, use ‘p.(page number)’ for a single page or ‘pp.(page numbers)’ to indicate a page range.
  • Page numbers should always be written out in full, e.g. 175-179, not 175-9.
  • Where a colon or dash appears in the title of an article or book chapter, the letter that follows that colon or dash should always be lower case.
  • When citing a work with multiple editors, use the abbreviation ‘Ed.s’.

At the end of your paper, please supply a reference list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines below. Where a DOI is available, this should be included at the end of the reference.

For books

Surname, initials (year), title of book, publisher, place of publication.

e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), No Place to Hide, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.

For book chapters

Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's surname, initials (Ed.), title of book, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M. (Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.

For journals

Surname, initials (year), "title of article", journal name, volume issue, page numbers.

e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.

For published 
conference proceedings

Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.), title of published proceeding which may include place and date(s) held, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors contributing to the competitiveness of tourism destinations at varying stages of development”, in Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel, M. (Ed.s), CAUTHE 2008: Where the 'bloody hell' are we?, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, pp.115-118.

For unpublished 
conference proceedings

Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper presented at [name of conference], [date of conference], [place of conference], available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).

e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed 20 February 2007).

For working papers

Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working paper [number if available], institution or organization, place of organization, date.

e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.

For encyclopaedia entries 
(with no author or editor)

Title of encyclopaedia (year), "title of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Encyclopaedia Britannica (1926), "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp.765-771.

(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter guidelines above)

For newspaper 
articles (authored)

Surname, initials (year), "article title", newspaper, date, page numbers.

e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", Daily News, 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.

For newspaper 
articles (non-authored)

Newspaper (year), "article title", date, page numbers.

e.g. Daily News (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p.7.

For archival or other unpublished sources

Surname, initials (year), "title of document", unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.

e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

For electronic sources

If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as the date that the resource was accessed.

Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date month year).

e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing strong thesis statements”, available at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/ (accessed 20 June 2018)

Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or date, should be included either inside parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (Roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).

For data

Surname, initials (year), title of dataset, name of data repository, available at: persistent URL, (accessed date month year).

e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015), American National Election Study, 1948, ICPSR07218-v4, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available at: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v4 (accessed 20 June 2018)

Submit your manuscript

There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.

Double check your manuscript

Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:

  • Give the journal aims and scope a final read. Is your manuscript definitely a good fit? If it isn’t, the editor may decline it without peer review.
  • Does your manuscript comply with our research and publishing ethics guidelines?
  • Have you cleared any necessary publishing permissions?
  • Have you followed all the formatting requirements laid out in these author guidelines?
  • Does the manuscript contain any information that might help the reviewer identify you? This could compromise the anonymous peer review process. A few tips:
    • If you need to refer to your own work, use wording such as ‘previous research has demonstrated’ not ‘our previous research has demonstrated’.
    • If you need to refer to your own, currently unpublished work, don’t include this work in the reference list.
    • Any acknowledgments or author biographies should be uploaded as separate files.
    • Carry out a final check to ensure that no author names appear anywhere in the manuscript. This includes in figures or captions.

You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit.

The submission process

All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.

The only way to submit to the journal is through the journal’s ScholarOne site as accessed via the Emerald website, and not by email or through any third-party agent/company, journal representative, or website. Submissions should be done directly by the author(s) through the ScholarOne site and not via a third-party proxy on their behalf.

A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.

Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.

Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.

Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier.

Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.

What you can expect next

You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact our Rights team on [email protected]

Post submission

Review and decision process

Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.

If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double anonymous peer review.  Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.

This journal offers an article transfer service. If the editor decides to decline your manuscript, either before or after peer review, they may offer to transfer it to a more relevant Emerald journal in this field. If you accept, your ScholarOne author account, and the accounts of your co-authors, will automatically transfer to the new journal, along with your manuscript and any accompanying peer review reports. However, you will still need to log in to ScholarOne to complete the submission process using your existing username and password. While accepting a transfer does not guarantee the receiving journal will publish your work, an editor will only suggest a transfer if they feel your article is a good fit with the new title.

While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.

During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper.  Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent and we recommend you email [email protected].

Manuscript transfer service

Emerald’s manuscript transfer service takes the pain out of the submission process if your manuscript doesn’t fit your initial journal choice. Our team of expert Editors from participating journals work together to identify alternative journals that better align with your research, ensuring your work finds the ideal publication home it deserves. Our dedicated team is committed to supporting authors like you in finding the right home for your research.

If a journal is participating in the manuscript transfer program, the Editor has the option to recommend your paper for transfer. If a transfer decision is made by the Editor, you will receive an email with the details of the recommended journal and the option to accept or reject the transfer. It’s always down to you as the author to decide if you’d like to accept. If you do accept, your paper and any reviewer reports will automatically be transferred to the recommended journals. Authors will then confirm resubmissions in the new journal’s ScholarOne system.

Our Manuscript Transfer Service page has more information on the process.

If your submission is accepted

Open access

Once your paper is accepted, you will have the opportunity to indicate whether you would like to publish your paper via the gold open access route.

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge).  This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

Copyright

All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form.  This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal content editor. You will find their contact details on the editorial team section above.

Proofing and typesetting

Once we have received your completed licence form, the article will pass directly into the production process. We will carry out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. This is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.

When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and proofed version of record is published online. This is referred to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of publication.

How to share your paper

Visit our author rights page to find out how you can reuse and share your work.

To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about how to promote your work.

Correcting inaccuracies in your published paper

Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our article withdrawal and correction policies.

Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.

Frequently Asked Questions

The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article-processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal), and never at submission.

Read about our APCs

At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication, processing, or review. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email that appears to be from Emerald, the journal, or a third party, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our support team via [email protected].

Editorial team
  • Senior Co-Editor

  • Co-Editor

  • Associate Editor

    • Dr Chrysostomos Apostolidis
      University of Northumbria – Newcastle Business School - UK
    • Dr. Courtney Azzari
      University of North Florida - USA
    • Professor Amanda Beatson
      Queensland University - Australia
    • Dr Gabriela Beirão
      University of Porto - Portugal
    • Professor Kimmy Chan
      Hong Kong Baptist University - Hong Kong
    • Professor Tom Chen
      University of Kent - UK
    • Dr. Maria Colurcio
      Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro - Italy
    • Professor J Joseph Cronin, Jr., Ph.D
      Florida State University - USA
    • Dr Janet Davey
      Victoria University Wellington - New Zealand
    • Sarah Dodds
      Massey University - New Zealand
    • Professor Jörg Finsterwalder
      University of Canterbury - New Zealand
    • Mario Eduardo Giraldo Oliveros
      Universidad del Norte - Colombia
    • Professor Ross Gordon
      University of Technology Sydney - Australia
    • Associate Professor Wafa Hammedi
      University of Namur - Belgium
    • Professor Thomas Hollmann
      Arizona State University - USA
    • Dr Pramod Iyer
      Kennesaw State University - USA
    • Professor Raechel Johns
      University of Canberra - Australia
    • Professor Ingo Karpen
      Karlstad University - Sweden
    • Professor Philipp Klaus
      International University of Monaco, INSECC Research Center - Monaco
    • Professor Volker Kuppelwieser
      NEOMA Business School - France
    • Henna Leino
      Turku School of Economics - Finland
    • Associate Professor Kate Letheren
      Australian Catholic University - Australia
    • Professor Jiun-Sheng Chris Lin
      National Taiwan University - Taiwan
    • Professor Rory Mulcahy
      University of the Sunshine Coast - Australia
    • Dr. Yupal Shukla
      IRSSM - India
    • Associate Professor Ramendra Thakur
      University of Louisiana at Lafayette - USA
    • Professor Rodoula Tsiotsou
      University of Macedonia - Greece
    • Associate Professor Josina Vink
      Oslo School of Architecture and Design - Norway
  • Commissioning Editor

  • Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Editorial Advisory Board

    • Assistant Professor Melissa Akaka
      University of Denver - USA
    • Dr Levent Altinay
      Oxford Brookes University - UK
    • Assistant Professor Nwamaka Anaza
      Southern Illinois University Carbondale - USA
    • Assistant Professor Kelley Cours Anderson
      College of Charleston - USA
    • Professor Nicholas J. Ashill
      Victoria University of Wellington - New Zealand
    • Assistant Professor Todd Bacile
      Loyola University New Orleans - USA
    • Dr. Melissa Baker
      UMass Amherst - USA
    • Associate Professor Thomas Baker
      University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa - USA
    • Dr Donald Barnes
      University of North Carolina Wilmington - USA
    • Professor Sabine Benoit
      Singapore Management University - Singapore
    • Professor Blaise J Bergiel
      University of West Georgia - USA
    • Professor Jeffrey Blodgett
      University of Houston - Victoria - USA
    • Professor Liliana Bove
      The University of Melbourne - Australia
    • Professor Matthew Bunker
      University of Northern Iowa - USA
    • Professor Jamie Burton
      Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester - UK
    • Associate Professor Mark Anthony Camilleri
      University of Malta - Malta
    • Dr Walid Chaouali
      University of Jendouba - Tunisia
    • Associate Professor Charlene Dadzie
      University of South Alabama - USA
    • Associate Professor Gopal Das
      Indian Institute of Management Bangalore - India
    • Professor Kate L. Daunt
      Cardiff Business School - UK
    • Dr Janet Davey
      Victoria University Wellington - New Zealand
    • Professor Barry J Davies
      University of Gloucestershire - UK
    • Associate Professor Phillippe Duverger
      Towson University - USA
    • Dr Dahlia El-Manstrly
      University of Edinburgh Business School - UK
    • Professor David Faulds
      University of Louisville - USA
    • Professor Raymond P. Fisk
      ServCollab - USA
    • Professor Dale Fodness
      University of Dallas - USA
    • Dr Tony Garry
      University of Otago - New Zealand
    • Professor Mario Giraldo
      Universidad del Norte - Barranquilla - Colombia
    • Professor Dominique Greer
      Queensland University of Technology - Australia
    • Assistant Professor Amy Gregory
      University of Central Florida - USA
    • Professor Stephen J Grove
      Clemson University - USA
    • Dr Johanna Katariina Gummerus
      Hanken School of Economics - Finland
    • Associate Professor Lin Guo
      Old Dominion University - USA
    • Professor John D. Hansen
      University of Alabama at Birmingham - USA
    • Associate Professor Eric G. Harris
      Pittsburg State University - USA
    • Professor Lloyd Harris
      University of Birmingham - UK
    • Professor Kim Harris-Cassidy
      Nottingham Trent University - UK
    • Professor Kristina Heinonen
      Hanken School of Economics - Finland
    • Professor Toni Hilton
      Glasgow Caledonian University - UK
    • Linda D. Hollebeek
      Sunway University - Malaysia
    • Professor Jonas Holmqvist
      Kedge Business School - France
    • Professor Tim Hughes
      University of the West of England - UK
    • Professor Elina Jaakkola
      University of Turku - Finland
    • Professor Lester W Johnson
      Swinburne University - Australia
    • Dr Byron Keating
      Queensland University of Technology - Australia
    • Professor Scott W. Kelley
      University of Kentucky - USA
    • Professor Christian Kowalkowski
      Linköping University - Sweden
    • Dr Bodo Lang
      University of Auckland - New Zealand
    • Professor Bart Larivière
      KU Leuven - Belgium
    • Dr Tiffany S. Legendre
      University of Houston - USA
    • Professor Annouk Lievens
      University of Antwerp - Belgium
    • Associate Professor Heejin Lim
      University of Tennessee - USA
    • Professor Dominik Mahr
      Maastricht University - Netherlands
    • Associate Professor David Martin
      Auburn University - USA
    • Associate Professor Lee McGinnis
      Stonehill College - USA
    • Associate Professor Joanna Melancon
      Western Kentucky University - USA
    • Dr Kars Mennens
      Maastricht University - Netherlands
    • Dr. Kalyani Menon
      Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University - Canada
    • Dr. Atmadeep Mukherjee
      Weber State University - USA
    • Professor Rory Mulcahy
      University of the Sunshine Coast - Australia
    • Associate Professor Duane Nagel
      Wichita State University - USA
    • Dr Amin Nazifi
      University of Birmingham - UK
    • Professor Richard Nicholls
      Worcester Business School, University of Worcester - UK
    • Professor Aron O'Cass
      Macquarie University - Australia
    • Professor Lisa O'Malley
      University of Limerick - Ireland
    • Professor Gaby Oderkerken
      Maastricht University - Netherlands
    • Dr Jason Oliver
      East Carolina University - USA
    • Professor Adrian J Palmer
      University of Wales Swansea - UK
    • Professor Joy Parkinson
      Australian Catholic University - Australia
    • Professor Lia Patricio
      University of Porto - Portugal
    • Professor Anthony Patterson
      Lancaster University - UK
    • Professor Paul G Patterson
      The University of New South Wales - Australia
    • Professor Maria Raciti
      University of Sunshine Coast - Australia
    • Professor Javier Reynoso
      EGADE, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey - Mexico
    • Dr Nichola Robertson
      Deakin University - Australia
    • Professor Michel Rod
      Carleton University - Canada
    • Professor Sanjit Kumar Roy
      Edith Cowan University - Australia
    • Dr László Sajtos
      The University of Auckland - New Zealand
    • Dr Tali Seger-Guttmann
      Ruppin Academic Center - Israel
    • Dr Harjit Sekhon
      Coventry University - UK
    • Associate Professor Daniel Shen
      State University of New York - USA
    • Professor Elaine Sherman
      Hofstra University - USA
    • Associate Professor Jeremy J. Sierra
      Texas State University - San Marcos - USA
    • Professor Marianna Sigala
      University of Newcastle - Australia
    • Associate Professor Cláudia Simões
      University of Minho - Portugal
    • Dr Erose Sthapit
      Manchester Metropolitan University - UK
    • Associate Professor Jeff W Totten
      McNeese State University - USA
    • Dr Sven Tuzovic
      Queensland University of Technology - Australia
    • Professor Giampaolo Viglia
      Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth - UK
    • Professor Paul Williams
      American University of Sharjah - United Arab Emirates
    • Prof Dr Heidi Winklhofer
      Nottingham University Business School - UK
    • Professor Lars Witell
      Linköping University - Sweden
    • Professor Ip Kin Anthony Wong
      University of Macau - People's Republic of China
    • Professor Dana Yagil
      University of Haifa - Israel
    • Dr Nadia Zainuddin
      University of Wollongong - USA
    • Associate Professor Zhen Zhu
      Suffolk University - USA
    • Professor Judy Zolkiewski
      Alliance Manchester Business School - UK
    • Dr Catharina von Koskull
      Hanken School of Economics - Finland
  • Expert Research Panel for Service Operations

    • Professor Joy Field
      Boston College, USA - USA
    • Liana Victorina
      University of Victoria, Canada
Indexing & metrics

Citation metrics

Scopus Logo

7.4

CiteScore 2024

Scopus Logo

7.4

CiteScore 2024

Further information

CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

 

Scopus Logo

9.3

CiteScore Tracker 2025

(updated monthly)

Scopus Logo

9.3

CiteScore Tracker 2025

(updated monthly)

Further information

 CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.

 

The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

Clarivate analytics logo

4.5

2024 Impact Factor

Clarivate analytics logo

4.5

2024 Impact Factor

Further information

The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Clarivate Analytics. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.

 

For more information and methodology see Clarivate Analytics

Clarivate analytics logo

5.3

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Clarivate analytics logo

5.3

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Further information

A base of five years may be more appropriate for journals in certain fields because the body of citations may not be large enough to make reasonable comparisons, or it may take longer than two years to publish and distribute leading to a longer period before others cite the work.

 

Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics.


Publication timeline

Time to first decision

32

days

Time to first decision

32

days

Further information

Time to first decision, expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025

Acceptance to publication

32

days

Acceptance to publication

32

days

Further information

Acceptance to publication, expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal. 

 

Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated April 2025)

Acceptance rate

12.5

%

Acceptance rate

12.5

%

Further information

The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025.


Usage

Downloads

28343

Articles

Downloads

28343

Articles

Further information

This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months

 

(Last updated: April 2025)

This journal is abstracted and indexed by

  • Business Source Complete
  • Emerald Management Reviews
  • Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Management and Marketing
  • CNRS (France)
  • Current Citations Express
  • Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Electronic Collections Online
  • EP Collection
  • Expanded Academic Index
  • FMS Journal Rating Guide (C)
  • FNEGE (France)
  • Gale
  • Galileo
  • General Reference Center
  • Inspec
  • Manning & Napier
  • QUALIS
  • ReadCube Discover
  • The Marketing Report
  • Telebase
  • Zetoc (British Library)
  • AIDEA (Italy)
  • Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List - A ranking
  • Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS, UK) Academic Journal Guide
  • Scopus
  • Social Science Citation Index SSCI (Clarivate Analytics)
  • The Publication Forum (Finland)
Reviewers

Reviewer information


Peer review process

This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Vision

Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.

Values

The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.

Ethics

All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.


Resources to guide you through the review process

Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.

More reviewer information


Calls for papers & news

Calls for papers

Closes:
31 Jul 2026

Historical Perspectives on the Development of Services Marketing Theory & Practice

Journal of Services Marketing

Submit your paper here from 9 February 2026!IntroductionIn an era dominated by emerging technologies, predictive algorithms, and hyper-personalized m...

Guest editor(s):
J. Joseph Cronin Jr, D.M. Nagel
Historical Perspectives on the Development of Services Marketing Theory & Practice
Closes:
31 Jul 2026

The Emotional Burden and Uplift of Service Experiences: Designing Tomorrow's Human-Centred Services

Journal of Services Marketing

Submit your paper here from 9 February 2026! IntroductionServices have always aimed to meet human needs, with decades of valuable research adva...

Guest editor(s):
Rory Mulcahy, Kate Letheren
The Emotional Burden and Uplift of Service Experiences: Designing Tomorrow's Human-Centred Services
Closes:
31 Jul 2026

Redefining Luxury Services: Exclusive Experiences, Emerging Elites, and the Future of Yachting

Journal of Services Marketing

Submit your paper here from 9 February 2026!IntroductionThe Journal of Services Marketing invites submissions for a special issue focused on the futu...

Guest editor(s):
Prof. Dr. Phil Klaus
Redefining Luxury Services: Exclusive Experiences, Emerging Elites, and the Future of Yachting

News

Thank you to the 2024 Reviewers of Journal of Services Marketing

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2024 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high...

28/08/2025
Thank you to the 2024 Reviewers of Journal of Services Marketing

Thank you to the 2023 Reviewers of Journal of Services Marketing

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2023 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high...

23/09/2024
Thank you to the 2023 Reviewers of Journal of Services Marketing

Previous award winners of the Steve Baron Award

Steve’s perspective on contribution to the service community. I believe that contributions to the service research community do go beyond what is immediately visible, such as research publications and teaching innovation...

19/07/2024
Previous award winners of the Steve Baron Award

Steve Baron Award for Outstanding Contribution to the Service Research Community

...

06/03/2024
Steve Baron Award for Outstanding Contribution to the Service Research Community

JSM papers included in WHO COVID-19 database

The importance of services marketing research for improving the health and wellbeing of global citizens has been recognised by the World Health Organisation with the inclusion of the following 18 Journal of Services Marketing articles ...

09/02/2023
JSM papers included in WHO COVID-19 database

Emerald: 1st ServCollab Special Issue Free Access

Founded in 2018 by Ray Fisk, ...

07/12/2022
Emerald: 1st ServCollab Special Issue Free Access

Revisiting seminal JSM articles in the first decade: The retrospective collection 1986 - 1995

In 2016, JSM celebrated 30 years, and to commemorate this milestone the editors Prof Steve Baron and Prof Rebekah Russell-Bennett wrote an editorial about the importance of revisiting the past, and invited authors of seminal pap...

18/10/2021
Revisiting seminal JSM articles in the first decade: The retrospective collection 1986 - 1995

JSM Editorials

2022 Editorial: Research priorities in the new service marketplace...

10/09/2020
JSM Editorials

Editorial Honour Roll

A journal cannot exist without the selfless service of colleagues who are willing to provide their time and expertise to encourage quality research to be submitted and peer reviewed.  Since the establishment of the journal in 1986, the follow...

11/07/2019
Editorial Honour Roll

JSM KeyWords 2019

The Editorial Team of JSM would like to encourage you to select from the keywords below, when submitting a manuscript to ScholarOne: Airline industry artificial intelligence Atmospherics Baby Boomers Base of the...

02/04/2019
JSM KeyWords 2019

Literati awards

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award winners 2025

We are pleased to announce our 2025 Literati Award winners!Outstanding PaperService sy...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award winners 2025

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2024

We are pleased to announce our 2024 Literati Award winners.   Outstanding Paper A dignity-vulnerability approach fra...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2024
2023 literati award winners banner

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2023

We are pleased to announce our 2023 Literati Award winners.   Outstanding Paper A voice for the silent: un...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2023

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2022 

We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Shaping service delivery throu...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2022 

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2022

We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper ...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2022

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2021

We are pleased to announce our 2021 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Artificial intelligence: disru...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2021

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2020

We are pleased to announce our 2020 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Value of social robots in services: social cognition p...

Journal of Services Marketing - Literati Award Winners 2020

Journal of Services Marketing addresses a range of services-related issues of interest to marketing scholars and relevant to marketing professionals who represent a broad range of service industries.

ISSN: 0887-6045
eISSN: 2054-1651

You can choose to publish your article open access in this journal by indicating on the editorial system when you submit your paper.

Aims and scope

The Journal of Services Marketing (JSM) is not preferentially disposed towards either empirical work or pure theory, nor towards one particular method or approach.

JSM will be an outlet for research that is:

  • unique and interesting research on services marketing in a contemporary global world
  • from a diverse range of methodological, philosophical and theoretical approaches
  • situated within either a pure or applied research tradition
  • well-grounded theoretical conceptualisation
  • rigorous and appropriate research methodology
  • well written and of clear relevance and interest to services marketing scholarship and practice.

JSM is keen to publish manuscripts that address contemporary issues relevant to services marketing that make a clear contribution to services marketing scholarship and practice.

Topics currently of interest to the editors are:

  • The role of services in transforming society and consumer lives
  • New methodological approaches for service research
  • Services marketing and the bottom-of-the pyramid
  • The role of new technologies and interactivity
  • Off-shoring and outsourcing of services
  • Servitization
  • Service design
  • Co-creation and third-parties
  • Crowd-sourcing
  • The future and key trends in the practice of services marketing: what researchers need to know
  • Micro-businesses, cottage industries and the service sector
  • Social service enterprises
  • Viewing service(s) through a new lens.

This title is aligned with our responsible management goal

We aim to champion researchers, practitioners, policymakers and organisations who share our goals of contributing to a more ethical, responsible and sustainable way of working.

SDG 1 No poverty
SDG 2 Zero hunger
SDG 8 Decent work & economic growth
SDG 9 Industry, innovation & infrastructure
SDG 10 Reduced inequalities
SDG 11 Sustainable cities & communities
SDG 12 Responsible consumption & production
SDG 13 Climate action
Find out about our responsible management goal